Megan Hilty attends CTV Upfront 2012 Presentation in Toronto.
[Photo Credit: Robin Wong/PR Photos]
3boysful
White skin, white hair, white dress, white background . . . are we supposed to be looking at something here?
http://twitter.com/algaechick algaechick
The lovely red carpet?
CarolinLA
I just flashed to Sally Draper having her period reading your post. I guess it does give a new meaning to the term “red carpet”.
schadenfreudelicious
ok i am Canadian and dont even know who she is…should I?..*blushes*…
Cecilia Evans
Very bland. Dress is nice but dull. Shoes are hiddy. Hair and makeup are lacking. She definitely could have used a pop of color somewhere, and some accessories!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=702462366 Terry Graves
Ugh. Can you spell gonorrhea? Syphillis? This woman is NASTY.
TSkot
Did she get a role over you or something??
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=702462366 Terry Graves
Hair is too colored and too processed. The way she always has her mouth open makes me think of porn actresses during the money shot. Ugh.
MilaXX
um, I ‘m pretty sure that’s called a smile.
TieDye64
Exactly.
cmb92191
Well I like the dress, but it wouldn’t look right on me.
moppet
Nasty? Porn star? That seems over the top. The dress is bland but the style of it fits her well. I don’t share the hate-on that many have for this particular style of shoe, and it matches, so, whatever. I wish she had considered some jewelry.
MilaXX
Cute but I wish she was wearing a better shoe and maybe a bangle or cuff.
TSkot
Droopy hair and could use some color on the dress, but good silhouette on her.
Lina_bee
I’m finding it sort of adorable that CTV has upfronts, too. Granted, Canadian television has practically zero budget for these things and no one lends dresses for these sorts of events. Given that this is almost certainly a total DIY on her part, she looks quite good. She needs jewelry, sure, but I bet she also needs to pay rent this month.
TieDye64
This is rather bland, though not horrid. The putty shoes should be put down.
Scarlet39
I would have preferred a metallic shoe, but overall this is a nice look.
lilibetp
The shape of the dress is really flattering, but you need a magnifying glass to see that she’s actually wearing a dress and not just naked. Definitely needs some color. A pretty yellow, maybe.
gelcat
is it just the camera angle, or does this make her appear even shorter than normal?
http://twitter.com/Kathy_Marlow Kathy Marlow
I think I’d like it more if the print were reversed…and in a different color…green, aqua..pick one. It’s not that she looks bad, it’s that she doesn’t look great
belfebe
She looks good, but why the colorless shoes????????
quiltrx
It’s a cute dress if she were outside or something, but with the white background she just kind of disappears.
http://joyouslifesf.wordpress.com Kiltdntiltd
hey, Wasn’t Megan Hilty supposed to be in these shots? All I can see is the CTV background.
Jennifer Hofstetter
Pretty dress, boring hair, ugly matchy shoes.
AlexisPayne
Too white!
AuntieAnonny
This is too Real Houswives of NYC.
Lisa Dugan
It’s pretty, as is she, but everything is so terribly washed out.
marilyn
Neutral. Not good or bad. Ithink this result is what public-types try to avoid. They either want to look smashing or smashed. One extreme or the other.
Violina23
If there was ANY other backdrop, I think she’d look awesome.
LesYeuxHiboux
Unfortunate that she was photographed in front of a white wall. She looks pretty gorgeous, otherwise.
MilaXX
I think it’s supposed to be ruching.
LesYeuxHiboux
I’m sure it is, but asymmetrical ruching on a dress with a clean-edged pattern just doesn’t end well.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1401450038 April Winslow
I tried this dress on at TJ Maxx last month.. only $40-$50 for those who are interested. I think it was a Calvin Klein…